Amicus
curiae briefs, friend of the court briefs, Supreme Court, U.S. Constitution,
individual freedom and individual rights, First Amendment litigation
Major
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech, First Amendment, legal news, legal updates, checkoff legal
challenges, legal policy papersMajor supreme court cases, litigation,
amicus curiae briefs, government speech, First Amendment, legal
news, legal updates, checkoff legal challenges, legal policy papersMajor
supreme court cases, litigation, amicus curiae briefs, government
speech
|
Amicus
Curiae Briefs
The Center has
participated as amicus curiae in a number of cases involving constitutional
issues
CENTER'S LEGAL
ACTIVITIES INDEX:
Click on the links below to learn more about
the Centers legal activities: Litigation
Amicus
Briefs Policy
Papers
Corporate
America's Right to Free Speech:
Center Files Brief with Supreme Court in Nike Case
Arguing
that the U.S. Supreme Court should either clarify or abandon existing
commercial speech doctrine, the Center for Individual Freedom today
files an amicus brief before the High Court in Nike, Inc. v. Kasky...[more]
Center
Files Amicus Brief on Affirmative Action in U.S. Supreme
Court
Arguing that
affirmative action admissions programs violate both Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of
the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the Center for
Individual Freedom filed an amicus brief on January 16 urging the
U.S. Supreme Court to strike down the racial and ethnic preferences
used by the University of Michigan’s undergraduate and law schools
in their admissions...[more]
Center
Files Amicus Brief with Supreme Court In Nike Commercial Speech
Case
Arguing
that remarkable and immediate damage to First Amendment interests
are at continued risk, the Center for Individual Freedom today files
an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to grant review in
Nike, Inc. v. Kasky...[more]
Hand-Slapping
Opinion Issued in Sexual Harassment Case:
Burns v. City of Detroit Update
Many avid
court-watchers take pleasure in reading the frequent hand-slapping
opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court and state supreme courts as they
issue decisions on appeal from lower courts. Much like a parent-child
disciplinary situation, it is not often, if ever, that the reverse
occurs, with a lower court slapping the hand of a higher court.
But thats what appears to have happened recently in a decision
of a panel of the Michigan Court of Appeals...[more]
Center
Files Brief on Behalf of Tattoo Artist
White continues
to challenge both his conviction and the statute on the grounds
that banning the art of tattooing violates his constitutionally
protected right of free expression....[more]
To
download the brief, please click
here.
Center
files Amicus Brief in Support of Free Speech
On
April 10, 2002, the Center for Individual Freedom filed an amicus
curiae brief in the Michigan Court of Appeals, supporting the constitutional
right of free speech of both employees and employers in a hostile
workplace environment lawsuit...[more]
To
download the brief, please click
here.
Center
Files Brief on Behalf of Vanessa Leggett
The
Center for Individual Freedom has filed an amicus curiae brief with
the Supreme Court in support of Vanessa Leggetts petition
asking the Court to hear her case...[more]
To
download the brief,
please click
here.
Center
Files Amicus Brief in Ninth Circuit Campaign Finance Case
On
January 14, 2002, the Center for Individual Freedom, joined by the
James Madison Center for Free Speech, filed an amicus brief in support
of the Lincoln Club of Orange Countys request for rehearing
in its case against the City of Irvine, California. The case, before
a panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, challenges the
citys campaign finance law on the grounds that it violates
the rights of freedom of speech and free association...[more]
To
download the brief,
please click
here.
Center
for Individual Freedom Files Amicus Brief in Employment Discrimination
Case before U.S. Supreme Court
On
December 21, 2001, the Center for Individual Freedom filed an amicus
curiae brief on behalf of the corporate respondent in Swierkiewicz
v. Sorema, an employment discrimination case before the U.S. Supreme
Court. This case addresses the question whether a complaint alleging
claims of national origin and age discrimination against the employer
was properly dismissed for failure to state a claim...[more]
To read the
brief, please click
here.
Center
Files Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Anonymity Case
In
Watchtower v. Stratton, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether
there is a constitutional right to anonymity for door-to-door solicitors.
The case stems from an attempt by the Village of Stratton, Ohio,
to require solicitors of all types to first obtain permits before
going door-to-door in the village. The issue on appeal is whether
the First Amendment shields solicitors from having to disclose their
names and addresses in the permit process and display their names
on the permits if asked by a person to whom they are speaking
[more]
To read the
Centers brief, please click
here.
CIF
Files Amicus Brief Arguing That Ohios School Voucher Program
Does Not Violate the First Amendment
On November
9, 2001, the Center filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme
Court in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris,
arguing that Ohios school voucher program does not violate
the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The statewide program
allows low-income parents to use publicly financed vouchers as tuition
to send their children to private schools, whether they be religious
or secular in nature.
To view
the Centers amicus brief, please click
here.
CIF
Files Amicus Brief in Compelled Speech Case Before U.S. Supreme
Court
In United
States v. United Foods, Inc., No. 00-276 (U.S. Supreme Court),
the Center filed an amicus brief arguing that a federal law administered
by the U.S. Department of Agriculture that compelled mushroom producers
and processors to fund generic advertising for mushrooms violated
the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Center also argued
that if the Supreme Court were to view this case as involving the
government's own speech, the appropriate First Amendment test should
remain the same as applied to other forms of compelled speech....[more]
Click
Here to View CFIF's Brief 231Kb
Click
Here to View United Foods Brief 399Kb
Update:
Supreme Court Finds Mandatory
Ad Campaign Unconstitutional
In the long-awaited decision in United
States v. United Foods, Inc., the Supreme Court
took significant strides in undoing some of the damage caused by
its much-criticized 1997 decision in Glickman v. Wileman Brothers
& Elliot. In scoring a victory for the First Amendment, The
Court held, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy, that a federal statute
requiring mushroom growers to pay for generic advertisements to
promote mushrooms violated the First Amendment bycompelling support
for speech with which at least some of the growers disagreed.
To read the Supreme Courts decision, click
here.
CIF
Files Amicus Brief Against California Mandatory Plum Advertising
Program
In Gerawan
Farming, Inc. v. Veneman, No. S080610, (Calif. Supreme Court),
the Center filed an amicus brief arguing that a California program
compelling fruit growers to finance generic advertising of fruits
thus forcing them to speak violated both the First
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the free speech clause of
the California State Constitution.
Click
Here to View Brief 181Kb
Update:
The
California Supreme Court found that the program violated the state
constitutional protections for free speech and remanded the case
to the court below on November 27, 2000
CIF
Files Amicus Brief in Separation of Powers Case Before Supreme Court
In Whitman
v. American Trucking Association, No. 99-1257 (U.S. Supreme
Court), the Center filed an amicus brief arguing that the sweeping
delegation to the EPA to set National Ambient Air Quality Standards
provided insufficient guidance to the agency, allowed the agency
to make value and policy choices that were required to be made by
Congress, and thus constituted an improper delegation of legislative
power to an executive branch agency. The Center noted that the separation
of powers between the legislative and executive branches is an important
structural protection for individual freedom that was built into
the U.S. Constitution as a means of checking the exercise of governement
power.
Click
Here to View Brief 232Kb
Update:
On February 27, 2001, the Supreme Court upheld the EPA's authority
to enact the clean air standards. However, the Court placed important
restraints on the agency's regulatory authority by stating that
future standards enacted by the agency in order to protect public
health should be "sufficient, but not more than necessary."
Click Here to
View the U.S. Supreme Court Opinion
Center
Files Amicus Brief in 11th Circuit Judicial Speech Case
In
Butler v. Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission, No. 00-14137-DD
(U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Cir.), the Center has submitted
an amicus brief arguing that restrictions on the content of campaign
speech by candidates for state judicial office violated the First
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The restrictions at issue were
preliminarily enjoined by a federal district court and that preliminary
injunction is now on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Eleventh Circuit.
Click
Here to View Brief 239Kb
Update:
Both sides have filed all briefs with the court and argument was
heard on January 22, 2001. A motion for leave to file the Center's
amicus brief is currently pending before the court.
Update:
Alabama
Supreme Court Rules That Campaign Speech Restrictions on Judicial
Candidates Violate the First Amendment
The Alabama Supreme Court ruled in favor
of Supreme Court Justice Harold See on May 15, 2001, stating that
Canon 7B.(2) of the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics is facially
unconstitutional and that Canon 2A is unconstitutional as applied
in Justice Sees case against the Alabama Judicial Inquiry
Commission (JIC). The case comes before the Alabama Supreme Court
following certification to it of three questions of state law from
the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The
Court of Appeals certified three questions to the Supreme Court
of Alabama to assist it in determining whether to abstain from deciding
federal constitutional issues, in deference to state proceedings...[more]
To
subscribe to our e-mail list for periodic updates on
important litigation and legislation affecting your individual
freedoms, click here.
|